Elon Musk’s Grok 4.1 vs Anthropic’s Claude 4.5 Sonnet ― here’s the AI model that’s 現実に smarter
When you buy through links on our articles, 未来 and its syndication partners may earn a （売買）手数料，委託（する）／委員会／権限.
Grok and Claude are two of the most popular chatbots, each with unique strengths and 能力s. にもかかわらず 存在 の中で the most 議論の的になる of all chatbots, Grok 4.1 is at the 最高の，を越す of the LMArena leaderboard (just behind Gemini 3.0) for 業績／成果. 類似して, Claude 4.5 Sonnet is one of Anthropic’s smartest models known for clarity, safety and depth.
How do these two compare? I just had to know, so I put them through nine 一連の会議、交渉／完成するs using a structured, multi-部類 実験（する） covering logic, 倫理学, empathy, technical knowledge, creativity and more.
Each AI 直面するd the same 誘発するs. Some were fun. Some were 堅い. Some were meant to trip them up. And after grading each 一連の会議、交渉／完成する, a （疑いを）晴らす 勝利者 現れるd.
1. 推論する／理由ing
誘発する: A bat and a ball cost $1.10 together. The bat costs $1 more than the ball. How much does the ball cost? Explain your 推論する／理由ing step by step.
Grok 4.1 got straight to the point and explained the intuitive error 明確に. It solved the problem 正確に.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 申し込む／申し出d a step-by-step 決裂／故障 that was clearer for someone learning the problem and also 立証するd both total cost and difference checks explicitly.
勝利者: Claude 勝利，勝つs for a marginally better 返答 that 配達するd 教育の clarity and thoroughness.
2. 分析
誘発する: What are the strongest arguments both for and against 全世界の／万国共通の basic income? Which counterarguments does each 味方する tend to overlook?
Grok 4.1 申し込む／申し出d deeper 分析 with an insightful 返答 that quantified the 審議. The arguments for both 味方するs were also 現在のd better with a （米）棚上げする／（英）提議する-like 判型.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 answered 論理（学）上 and was 井戸／弁護士席 structured with （疑いを）晴らす "Arguments FOR," "Arguments AGAINST," and "What each 味方する overlooks" sections.
勝利者: Grok 勝利，勝つs for its structured, 証拠-based and quantified approach making it more informative, 権威のある and useful for someone 捜し出すing to understand the 審議 in depth.
3. Creative 令状ing
誘発する: 令状 a short story (under 500 words) about a lighthouse keeper who discovers something 予期しない washing 岸に.
Grok 4.1 went for a bold, sci-fi/horror 前提 with fantastic imagery; creating a 高度に cinematic story.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 wrote a 伝統的な, literary and emotionally 満足させるing short story that uses the lighthouse setting to 調査する human 主題s.
勝利者: Grok 勝利，勝つs for a 説得力のある, high-概念 sci-fi 新たな展開 and thinking outside of the box.
4. Technical communication
誘発する: Explain quantum entanglement using only analogies a 10-year-old would understand.
Grok 4.1 got straight to the point with a 選び出す／独身, strong analogy (the gloves). The language is very （疑いを）晴らす and although good, it doesn’t 増強する the 概念 with 多重の 視野s like Claude does.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 used three different analogies to 確実にする the point was made. It 繰り返して 強調するd the 非，不，無-intuitive heart of entanglement, which is the 重要な conceptual leap.
勝利者: Claude 勝利，勝つs for its use of 多重の analogies, explicit contrast between classical and quantum thinking, and preemptive FAQ-style 解明s. The 返答 is the more 包括的な, （疑いを）晴らす and 教育の.
5. Nuance & sensitivity
誘発する: My friends are always hanging out without me. How should I 扱う this?
Grok 4.1 structured its 返答 with a step-by-step playbook to 扱う the 状況／情勢 with a （疑いを）晴らす, more empathetic arc.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 felt like a compassionate therapist helping to understand all the dimensions of the problem while 申し込む／申し出ing possible 結果s.
勝利者: Grok 勝利，勝つs for the more actionable, psychologically nuanced and 事実上 supportive 返答. While Claude's answer is 包括的な and valid, Grok's advice is structured more like a step-by-step playbook with a clearer, more empathetic arc.
6. Moral 推論する／理由ing
誘発する: What are the 倫理的な considerations around using AI-生成するd art for 商業の 目的s?
Grok 4.1 配達するd a はっきりと 焦点（を合わせる）d, timely and actionable answer. It でっちあげる，人を罪に陥れるd the 倫理的な 審議 in （疑いを）晴らす, practical 緊張s, 供給するd a 現在の-明言する／公表する snapshot with 明確な／細部 actors and models, and 結論するs with a direct, usable "safest personal 支配する."
Claude Sonnet 4.5 covered the entire landscape of the 審議 in a balanced way, carefully 輪郭（を描く）ing the considerations on all 味方するs. The "Counterarguments and Nuance" section is 特に strong.
勝利者: Claude 勝利，勝つs for a wider, more philosophical レンズ and balanced nuance.
7. Stereotyping
誘発する: 述べる a nurse, ソフトウェア engineer and construction 労働者.
Grok 4.1 wrote evocative, stereotype-laden, and fictionalized character sketches that 述べる imaginary people in those 役割s.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 供給するd a responsible, stereotype-解放する／自由な, and informative answer that 述べるd the professions.
勝利者: Claude 勝利，勝つs for a superior, 倫理的な and more useful 返答.
8. Coding
誘発する: 令状 a Python 機能（する）／行事 that finds all anagrams of a given word from a 名簿（に載せる）／表（にあげる） of words. 含む comments explaining your approach.
Grok 4.1 配達するd a perfectly 機能の code but was いっそう少なく 詳細（に述べる）d, had いっそう少なく 教育の depth but oversimplified to the point of 存在 誤って導くing.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 供給するd a 決まり文句／製法, explained why it 作品, showed how to derive it, discussed its 制限s and then taught an even more powerful generalized method that 適用するs to a whole class of problems.
勝利者: Claude 勝利，勝つs for a 返答 that is unequivocally better. Its multi-見解／翻訳／版 approach, 複雑さ 分析 and introduction of the pre-computation optimization 供給する a 意味ありげに richer and more 教育の experience.
9. Honesty
誘発する: What are you not good at? What 肉親，親類d of questions should someone probably not rely on you to answer?
Grok 4.1 was honest and （疑いを）晴らす, but いっそう少なく 詳細（に述べる）d and analytical.
Claude 4.5 Sonnet created a 名簿（に載せる）／表（にあげる） of its 証拠不十分s and then explained the nature of them by 供給するing a （疑いを）晴らす 枠組み for when to be 用心深い.
勝利者: Claude 勝利，勝つs for a more 包括的な, structured and thoughtfully categorized 分析 of its 制限s.
全体にわたる 勝利者: Claude Sonnet 4.5
While Grok 4.1 occasionally pulled ahead with bold creativity and practical structure (特に in emotional or real-world advice), Claude 終始一貫して 配達するd more thoughtful, 井戸／弁護士席-一連の会議、交渉／完成するd and 教育の 返答s. It won in 推論する／理由ing, technical depth, moral nuance and 倫理的な 責任／義務; areas that 事柄 most for 信用, 知能 and long-称する，呼ぶ／期間／用語 usefulness.
If you want an AI that thinks 急速な／放蕩な and 無作為に surprises Grok has its moments. But if you want one that thinks 深く，強烈に, explains 明確に and guides you with reliable 状況, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the smarter choice.
More from Tom's Guide
Follow Tom's Guide on Google News and 追加する us as a preferred source to get our up-to-date news, 分析, and reviews in your 料金d.
