|
OpenOffice.org |
週刊誌 会合 事実上の 使用者 Interface Team
|
Date |
September 27th 2001 |
|---|---|
|
Time |
10:00h, MEST |
|
場所 |
Cupertino, eham-02 |
|
Attendees |
OS, FS, PB, CL, CJ, DR, GT |
|
Minute Taker |
Gunnar Timm |
|
Protokol Date |
October 4th 2001 |
|
配当 名簿（に載せる）／表（にあげる） |
ui.openoffice.org |
1. Last week TODOs
|
ToDo |
Responsible |
Status |
|---|---|---|
|
決定する and publish 責任／義務s |
OS |
In 進歩 |
|
組み立てる／集結する 名簿（に載せる）／表（にあげる） of UI 構成要素s/classes/dependencies |
OS |
In 進歩 |
|
Check if ありふれた UI code can/should be moved from SfxApplication to OfficeApplication |
FS |
In 進歩 |
|
New ToDo's |
||
|
決意 of the 必要物／必要条件s from the 使用／適用s for replaceable 状況 menus |
CL / DR / OS |
|
2. Interface of replaceable 状況 menus
We discussed several designs to 供給する replaceable 状況 menus. We 設立する at least two possible 解答s. The first one would pass the 状況 as a 始める，決める of affectect 反対するs, which would give a 類似の behaviour as for the own 状況 menus. The second 解答 would be to only pass the position and the window. So the 状況 menu itself must collect all necessary （警察などへの）密告，告訴（状）s. Additionally the new 状況 menu might also call 支援する to ask for more 詳細（に述べる）s on the given position and window.
Because we couldn't 査定する／（税金などを）課す however 正確に／まさに which requests are needed for such an interface, we have 延期，休会するd a 決定／判定勝ち（する） about this.
3. Replaceable Accelerators
After some short discussions about the 'usefullness' and the 成果／努力 for such a feature, we （機の）カム to the 結論, that it would be to expensive and that we don't need it at all.
4. Next 会合 minutes
CL, DR, OS, FS, PB, GT
Page
