結論: This is not a ウイルス, even not a proof of 概念

Thank you very much, the Kaspersky Labs 分析家 and other ウイルス 指名するing companies 専門家s for finding it and calling it "ウイルス," "proof of concenpt," "ウイルス.StarOffice.Stardust.a," "SBasic.Stardust.A!int," "XML_DUSTAR.A," "StarDust.intd," whatever.
Thank you, we learned a lot about ウイルスs, 大型の ウイルスs and proof of 概念 ウイルスs.

We love to see Our 結論s, opinions and OOoDust.

1. OpenOffice.org Team's 告示 and 結論:
"it is not even a ウイルス" "使用者s should never 受託する とじ込み／提出するs from unknown sources"

2. David Fraser's 結論:
"this is all nothing to be afraid of"

3. Pavel Janik's 結論:
"just 除去する it from your system"

4. Malte Timmermann's 結論:
"This is not a ウイルス, even not a proof of 概念"

5. John McCreesh's 結論:
"if we are relying on these 'anti-ウイルス 専門家s' to 保護する the IT 産業 from ウイルスs, then the sooner everyone moves to open-source ソフトウェア the better. At least then we can 裁判官 who the real 専門家s are"

6. Pavel Janik's opinion:
"the blogger from Kaspersky 簡単に should have 接触するd OpenOffice.org 安全 team first, not only because it is "基準 way" to 報告（する）／憶測 安全 問題／発行するs to vendors but it could also 妨げる everyone from this faux pas"

7. Laurent Godard's "proof of nothing," OOoDust
"OpenOffice.org 事業／計画（する） has a structure for 報告（する）／憶測ing any 怪しげな behaviour, so feel 解放する／自由な to 接触する us"

OpenOffice.org 安全 team: http://www.openoffice.org/安全/